After years of speculation and false starts, Tabcorp and Tatts Group have finally come to an agreement and announced their intention to enter into a merger.

A mountain of red tape and legal hurdles means nothing is expected to be finalised until mid-2017, so it’s early days yet in terms of what it might actually mean for punters.

Tote Betting

With Tabcorp operating the Victorian (SuperTAB) and New South Wales totes, and Tatts running UBET, the merger brings all Australian totalisators under the one body (other than Western Australia, which remains government-owned for now).

This has led to immediate speculation that pools will be merged into a national tote, providing deeper pools and better products and returns to punters. Both companies flagged this immediately.

“It give us a national footprint and create a pathway to larger wagering pools,” said Tabcorp Chairman Paula Dwyer.

“We are excited by this opportunity, which we believe will deliver an enhanced wagering experience for our customers and, in turn, will generate stronger returns to the Australian racing industry.”

Tatts Chairman Harry Boon echoed that.

“The benefits of this combination are also very clear for the racing industry and for customers who should, in due course and with racing industry support, be able to access deeper and more liquid wagering pools,“ said Boon.

Still, it’s by no means a certainty, illustrated by the separate totes for Victorian and New South Wales, despite both long being operated by Tabcorp. The issue of course is that small point from Boon: “…with racing industry support”.

Whist this merger would create what is effectively a national wagering and totalisator body, racing itself remains state-based. Any merging of tote pools would be dependent on state racing bodies agreeing on a split funding model, and agreement and co-operation is far from a certainty whenever racing bodies come together.

Fixed Odds Betting

In addition to the totes, both Tabcorp and Tatts operate fixed odds bookmaking on racing and sports – Tatts through their UBET brand, and Tabcorp with as well as their corporate brand Luxbet.

Unlike the tote situation, punters may want as much separation as possible to remain here.  Reducing these three brands to two or even one can only lessen competition in the marketplace.

Whilst there’s been little official indication at this stage regarding any potential merger of these brands, the Australian Financial Review reports that the UBET brand will be phased out, which suggests that the TAB brand will effectively go national.  This would be in line with some suggestions that Tatts’ rollout of the UBET brand has not been as successful as was hoped.

Luxbet is licensed in the Northern Territory, which has a lower cost of doing business for wagering operators and hence a higher margin. It stands to reason that the combined body may want to retain a proportion of its business under this model.



What they said…

Richard Irvine, Fair Wagering Australia:

“It’s hard to tell at this stage what it means for punters, but I would like to see UBET fixed odds remain to stoke competition in the fixed odds market.

“I hope that this merger is the start of the industry heading towards a national tote, and more importantly – both for punters and the viability of the industry – tote take-out rates are addressed. Punters won’t bet into 118% markets 10-15 years from now and the industry needs to be cognisant of this.”

Greg Conroy, industry veteran and founder/CEO of RewardBet:

“It’s been a long time coming. It’ll help the push for a national tote and that conversation will become a whole lot easier. That’s a very positive thing.

“It might make the new entity a little more prepared to take risks with products, and produce more competitive take-out rates and stronger, deeper pools. They’re going to be so big that they can actually take more initiative and lead, and be innovative from a position of strength.”


  1. In one of your articles you state that BEST TOTE is good for the punters– and bad for the bookies.
    Here ,you are jumping on the bandwaggon of combining all into one TAB. ( which will be poor for the average punter ).
    These 2 articles contradict each other.
    You should be fighting AGAINST combining Tabs.

    • Hi Phil

      A couple of different issues I think. Best Tote is just a promotional product offered by bookmakers – it doesn’t represent what a national tote would be. It’s a good product and our only direction would be to not abuse it with any one bookmaker, as it’s a low-margin product for them and could lead to you losing access to it.

      A national tote wouldn’t necessarily be a bad thing for punters. It could hopefully produce a more competitive punting product and thus give punters another good option, as fewer and fewer are betting into the totes now. The larger pools would hopefully result in more stable prices, and the big one: a national tote re-structure would hopefully result in the addressing of take-out rates.